Recently, the Star Tribune has raised an interesting question: is it right to remove disturbing language from works of literature? This debate has been reignited due to the recent decision by Penguin Random House to remove racially offensive language from Roald Dahl’s classic children’s books.
On the one hand, some argue that it is important to preserve the original text, as it is a reflection of the time in which it was written. On the other hand, many believe that language which is offensive or hurtful should be removed from literature, in order to make it more accessible and inclusive for readers.
This is a complex issue, and one which requires careful consideration. It is important to recognize that language can be used to oppress or marginalize certain groups, and that this should not be tolerated in any form. At the same time, it is also important to recognize that literature is a reflection of the society in which it was written, and that removing certain language can change the meaning of the text.
Ultimately, this is a decision which must be made on a case-by-case basis. It is important to weigh the pros and cons of each situation, and to consider the impact that any changes may have on readers. As we grapple with this difficult issue, it is essential that we take into account all perspectives and strive for an equitable solution.
